Archive for August, 2005

Saturday, August 27th 2005

How I Became a Browser Nerd and a Firefox Addict (And Some Thoughts About the Future)

The Beginning

I guess it all started back in 1998 when we were to make our own websites at school. (I was 15 at the time.) To make them, we had Netscape Composer – version 4 if I remember correctly.

Somehow I got hooked on this whole webpage making thing. I guess I had always enjoyed making nicely laid out documents with word processors, ever since I was a tiny kid. The ability to produce a dynamic document with colours really appealed to me, since any paper documents I made could only be printed on our (black and white) laser.

Naturally, my first website was an incredible strain to the viewers eyes. What, with animated flags and spinning e-mail icons, frantically psychedelic backgrounds, and an over-all colour theme that made your stomach churn. This was presumably making up for all the years of black and white only. Sadly, I can’t seem to find a copy of the old gem. Maybe it’s for the best.

I can’t remember if we were encouraged by the teachers to start poking with the HTML code in notepad or if I just decided to have a look anyway. Anyway – fairly soon I felt more comfortable editing the HTML directly than using Composer. (Which, looking back, maybe wasn’t so strange…)

After about a year or so I made a completely new (personal) website. This time around it was a little more pleasant and usable. Below is a screenshot of the website, as seen with an authentic, 1990’s web browser:

Screenshot of one of my old websites

The Cold War

Obviously, all of this was in the middle of the raging browser wars. Some of my class mates thought Internet Explorer was better, while I for some reason always preferred Netscape. (At this time I had no idea about which browser was most standards compliant – all I knew was that they weren’t compatible, and special tweaking of the code was required to serve both browsers.) I guess I preferred Netscape because I was used to it, and Microsoft was the big bad company. (This impression was mostly because their Word had more or less already out-competed Word Perfect.)

I remember reading in a book at the library, about HTML and suchlike, that the upcoming, version 6 browsers could turn out to be standards compliant – as opposed to all the previous versions. Heh. If only both the version 6 browsers had strived for that goal…

The Long Wait

I saw the Internet Explorer versions come and go. I was waiting for Netscape to release their next version (nr 5, which became nr 6). This turned out to be a very long wait, as we all know. I kept up to date with the browser world by watching, a CNet website – back in the days when it actually had some kind of content. (Nowadays it’s barely a collection of links, and a list of the most popular browser downloads.)

Screenshot of Netscape 6.0

Finally Netscape 6.0 was released (November 2000), but to pretty chilly reviews. Buggy and slow was the general verdict. If I remember correctly I waited until version 6.2 before I installed it on my dad’s computer. A year-and-a-half later (in June 2002) I read on that Mozilla 1.0 had been released. I hadn’t heard much about Mozilla before this, so I was rather curious. I learnt that this was what Netscape 6 had been built from. I liked the idea of always having the latest and greatest web browser, so I chose Mozilla over Netscape.

Tabs, of course, made for love at first sight – a great feature for someone like me who liked surfing a lot. They were also very handy when on a dial-up modem, which I was at the time – just open the interesting pages in a bunch of new tabs and disconnect before you start reading them.

To begin with, for news on Mozilla, I mostly just checked With time though, I started reading MozillaZine more and more often to get the nitty gritty details. I faithfully downloaded each release, always checking the What’s New page to see which great features had been added. Here are some of the features I remember being particularly pleased about when they were introduced:

By now I was definately a Mozilla addict. Why should I use anything else? Mozilla was the best. Or was it?

The Skinny Newcomer

MozillaZine was increasingly reporting about this Phoenix thing. At first I didn’t take too much notice. I had become used to the Mozilla Suite and felt comfortable using it. Then when Firebird 0.6 was released in May 2003, I gave it a try. There were some things I liked about it straight away, like the way it handled tabs (slightly differently compared to Mozilla Suite) and the separate search box. Other things that were added later on during the development, such as the Extension and Theme managers, were also very handy.

At first I missed having all the managers which Mozilla Suite had: Cookie Manager, Popup Manager, Form Manager, Image Manager, Password Manager. You name it. (Did I hear someone say control freak?) Pretty soon though, I realized that all those Managers weren’t really necessary. Firebird showed that it was possible to get along without them, thanks to carefully chosen default values of the preferences and smarter handling of, for instance, passwords.

Like most of us, I was pretty (positively) shocked and surprised when Firebird was renamed Firefox, at version 0.8, and given a new logo. They worked great together. Then, at version 0.9, the default (Windows) theme was changed too. While many people didn’t like the new theme, I always thought it was better than Qute (the previous theme), which I realized had some rather inconsistent icons. The new theme was more professional in style, and at the same time remaining colourful and XPish.

Firefox was, by the final release, a great browser for almost everyone. I could (and still can, of course) install it on all my acquaintances computers, and they would hardly have any problems using it even though they hadn’t touched anything other than IE for what – like, 5 years? If ever. Firefox is (obviously) also loads of fun for the more advanced computer user who can install extensions to their hearts content, such as (my favourites) Adblock and Minimize to tray. There is an extension out there for every single purpose you can think of. Is there anything you can’t do with a Firefox extension?

What About Opera?

I was aware of Opera for quite some time – probably since around the time I first started keeping an eye on Since it was shareware, though, it didn’t really interest me. Opera released their first ad-supported version as early as December 2000 (version 5) but the banner put me off completely. (If I even tried it – I don’t remember.) It also had a somwhat awkward look, which I couldn’t quite get used to. The freeness, usability and, in fact, design of Mozilla Suite (and later Firefox), as well as their entirely open development process made me stay in the Mozilla camp.

The Future

Who knows what will happen the coming years. I know I will keep promoting Firefox, wherever I go. This became particularly easy when I was sent one of these, for… eh – I’m not really sure why I got it actually. They said something about me having given feedback. Hmm. Well, I suppose I have posted the odd post over at MozillaZine and Spread Firefox, if that’s what they meant. It can’t be for my bug reporting anyway: In three years I’ve only posted a single bug report. If they sent off a t-shirt for every bug report, they would have had to send out t-shirts worth more than $5,000,000. I know they are getting plenty of money from Google, but at that rate they must be raking in the cash by the ship loads. Anyway, whatever the reason, I’m not complaining. 🙂

I have a vision (like many others, I’m sure) that Firefox (and possibly Opera, if they decide to set it free) will help open up the web for good, and make it equally digestable on all operating systems. This, in turn, will allow more people to give Linux a serious try (myself included). Once Linux gains a nice chunk of the market, it will be very difficult for Microsoft to win people back. The difficulty for people lies in the actual switching. Once that’s done, I imagine sticking with a free operating system won’t exactly be a neck-breaker… Obviously though, Microsoft failing is not the point here. The point of this vision is that more people could (and would) use a large proportion of free software, thus saving heaps of cash – at the same time putting some much needed consumer pressure on Microsoft.

This vision is also why I believe we still can’t trust Microsoft to do the right thing with IE7 and IE8. The right thing – to make IE standards compliant – would only make the OS market slip even faster out of Microsofts control. However, I’m begging that Microsoft actually does decide to do the right thing. Imagine being a web developer in 2009, with almost 93% of the browser market being CSS3 compliant. Ah, the love…

Thursday, August 25th 2005

The Canon 5D is Almost What I’m Wanting

Of course, the term wanting is a broad term. Maybe I should say The Canon 5D is Almost Something I Could Buy. But it’s just a tad too expensive still, at around $3,300, for my student budget. 🙂

The Canon EOS 5D

The ideal digital SLR (for me) would have around 8 megapixels, be capable of about 3 or 4 frames per second and would have a full size image sensor. It could cost about $1,000 or so. Of course, I wouldn’t mind if it were even cheaper… The reason I would prefer a full-size image sensor is so that I can use my current Canon EF lenses without quality loss. (If I were to use a digital SLR with an image sensor smaller than the default 24×36 mm the chromatic aberration of my (fairly cheap) lenses would be magnified by the same factor as the rest of the picture. (Often 1.6 times with Canon’s digital SLRs.)

Wednesday, August 24th 2005

Opera To Be Freeware?

It’s great to hear that Opera may becoming freeware in the near future. This is what Opera has been needing so badly to gain further market share. Market share which would give their mobile browser much better brand recognition, and hence make it an even greater source of income for Opera the company.

Is it just me, or are Browser Wars II really starting to heat up?

Wednesday, August 24th 2005

Google Talk Slightly Disappointing

If you didn’t already know, Google has released their own instant messanging client, called Google Talk. However, I’m a little disappointed. I thought Google, in their usual spirit, would completely leave the competition in the dirt.

A screenshot of Google Talk.

Sure, the client is nice and simple, and has a good-looking interface. It also has Skype-style VoIP. But there are a few things it lacks in my eyes:

  • Compatibility with the other major IM protocols. (MSN, AOL, Yahoo, etc.) If they added this, I would probably switch to Google Talk from Gaim, my current IM program. And I don’t think Google can expect any serious success with Google Talk until they add this.
  • That little extra something, that we’ve grown used to with Google’s various services. Something that really makes it worth the switch. That (r)evolutionary feature that just makes it so much nicer to use than the competing alternatives. (I’m thinking 2.5 GB free webmail storage, saved searches, class-leading desktop search, revolutionary advertising program, etc.)

Sure, there are also things that already make it look very good:

  • No ads.
  • Clean look. (A googley look!)

Hopefully we’ll see an improved version out soon!

Update: According to this developers FAQ page, Google are hoping to add compatibility with other clients. However, if they succeed in persuading Microsoft to let them add MSN remains to be seen. Sounds unlikely to me.

Thursday, August 4th 2005

Autobild Impressions of Next Generation Volvo S60

The German car magazine Autobild has made some (very good-looking) computer renderings of what they think the new Volvo S60 will look like. If the real design turns out to be anything like this, it’ll be – like, totally – sweet.

Autobild impression of the upcoming S60, seen from the front.

Autobild impression of the upcoming S60, seen from the back.

I really like the light (chrome?) lines around the side windows. Looks nice. The front is a real neck-twister, too.

Thursday, August 4th 2005

What's Up With Opera and XSL?

The other day I was reading up on things like PHP and XML at W3schools. I was sortof hunting for a way to make my web gallery database driven. I got to the part about XSL, and was amazed at how useful and powerful, yet simple, it seemed. (Have a look at their samples.) The good feelings soon wore off though, when I realized Opera doesn’t support XSL at all.

My first thought was that if even IE6 from 2001 can do this (which it can), why on earth can’t Opera (v. 8)? After searching the Opera forums for answers, it turns out Opera (the company) doesn’t think XSL is a good idea. (Remember, this is a W3C standard…) Opera doesn’t think XML should be transformed on the users computer – instead they insist that this transformation should (always!) be done on the server. (Read more about XML transformations [XSLT] here.)

Well, that’s very easy for them to say. But for all the rest of us, who aren’t PHP 1337, XSLT seems like a very usable standard. Of course, as with any language, there are right and wrong ways to use it. For instance, if I were to be the developer of some huge website, I wouldn’t send the user 4 MB of raw XML data, and then make the XSLT document pick out a few hundred kBs to display in the browser. Since I’m a thinking human being, I realize that wouldn’t be a good idea. The Opera developers don’t seem to think webmasters are capable of that kind of brain activity.

Thursday, August 4th 2005

Mozilla Corporation: Let the Big Cash Come Rolling In

Mozilla Foundation announced yesterday that Mozilla Corporation has been created in order to simplify cashflow into the various Mozilla projects from other corporations. (MozillaZine has an article which explains the reorganization in an understandable way.) This sounds like good news to me. If the Mozilla Foundation has been earning cash at a rate which was problematic to it as a non-profit organization, that can’t not be a good thing.

Hopefully, corporate interest in the Mozilla products will increase even further. Also, I hope we’ll see Firefox and Thunderbird bundled with new computers from one (or more) of the major PC manufacturers in the not so distant future. Maybe this move from the Mozilla Foundation was in order to allow or simplify such a deal? Who knows.