Apparently, Mozilla hasn’t offered Firefox 3.5 users an upgrade to 3.6 until now. Why did it take so long? 3.6 was released almost two months ago.
Full-text blog feed
Comment feed
Friday, March 12th 2010
Apparently, Mozilla hasn’t offered Firefox 3.5 users an upgrade to 3.6 until now. Why did it take so long? 3.6 was released almost two months ago.
Tuesday, February 9th 2010
I have been meaning to write this post for a while now. I have found a few new favourite
extensions for Firefox. Mainly they help me make the most of the space on my screen.
Here’s what my screen looks like right now:

Hide Caption Titlebar Plusabove, this makes them easier to target with the mouse.
Hope you find these useful!
Monday, December 14th 2009
This week, Firefox will most likely become the most used web browser version in the world, according to Statcounter.

According to Net Applications though, Firefox 3.5 has a while to go before being king.
I wish Google would share their browser data. They did, way back, didn’t they?
Monday, November 9th 2009
Today, the 9th November, is Firefox’s 5th birthday. Firefox 1.0 was released the 9th November 2004.
Photo by Christopher Blizzard.
I didn’t start blogging until December 2004 so I have no historical blog post to link to.
Back in 2004 I’d already been using Firefox since version 0.6, released in May 2003. And I’d been a fan of the Mozilla Suite for roughly 2 ½ years. (Mozilla 1.0 was released 5th June 2002.) And before that I was happily using Netscape 6 since its release in November 2000.
In 2005 I wrote a long version of how I became such a huge Firefox fan. Towards the end, thinking about the future, I wrote:
Imagine being a web developer in 2009, with almost 93% of the browser market being CSS3 compliant.
Hah, that’s a laugh. It turns out things don’t move quite that fast. Still, we’re basically rid of the IE6 plague and IE7 is heading in the same direction – down.
Here’s to another 5 years of Firefox gaining market share! In 2014 it should have at least 50 percent. IE will be a minority player.
Tonight I’m meeting Mozilla Sweden
, i.e. David Tenser and Patrick Finch at the Bishop’s Arms for a … beer? Naw, a coke maybe.
Saturday, October 31st 2009
Firefox 3.6 beta 1 has just been released. Read all about it here. Get it here.
Three small improvements that I really like:
Wednesday, October 28th 2009
I just tried the Ubiquity add-on for Firefox for the first time. This thing is incredible! I just typed in weather and somehow it already knows where I am?! Almost scary!

Wednesday, October 28th 2009
Just found an extremely interesting video where Mozilla’s Aza Raskin explains how they are thinking of the future of the web.
Tuesday, June 30th 2009

Firefox 3.5 has been released today. Many improvements over 3.0. Faster, better privacy options, better standards support. Get it now.
Thursday, March 12th 2009
A couple of days ago I tested how good the latest unreleased browsers from Opera, Microsoft, Mozilla, Apple and Google are at running Javascript.
Today Mozilla released Firefox 3.1 beta 3. So I gave it a spin on the Sunspider and V8 Javascript benchmarks.
I was obviously expecting it to do better than beta 2 in both tests, but that didn’t quite turn out to be the case. Below are averages from three runs of each combination of browser and benchmark, using a clean Firefox profile. (Not safe mode, since that will reduce Javascript speed in beta 3!)
Edit: I just added the data from my previous test for the non-Firefox browsers, for comparison. I also made a nice new graph.
To make the two benchmarks more comparable I’ve normalized the scores (inverting the time data from Sunspider, turning it into speed). The winner of each benchmark is given 100 and the others are given relative scores.

And here is the raw data (averages for three runs):
| Browser | Sunspider (lower is better) |
V8 (higher is better) |
| Firefox 3.1 b2 | 1,737ms | 133 |
| Firefox 3.1 b3 | 2,150ms | 201 |
| Opera 10 a | 6,188ms | 137 |
| IE 8 rc1 | 7,994ms | 47 |
| Safari 4 b | 1,633ms | 1,056 |
| Chrome 1.0 | 1,761ms | 1,136 |
That’s pretty weird stuff. Beta 3 runs the V8 benchmark 51% faster than beta 2. But it chugs through the Sunspider benchmark 19% slower. (Or taking 24% longer, if you wish … 2150/1737 = 1.238 and 1/1.238 = 1-0.192)
Does anyone happen to know why this is the case? Was this a strategic move from the Firefox developers? I mean, did they introduce this slight performance regression knowingly, intending to fix it for final release?
Friday, February 20th 2009
Aftonbladet, the largest online news site in Sweden, is reminding IE6 users to upgrade to something better:
This couldn’t have happened too soon. Apparently, this is a campaign that started in Norway.