Thursday, October 2nd 2008
The article tries to give the current standings in the browser wars. But like many other articles on IDG.se it is full of holes and guesswork.
Here’s what got me annoyed (translated from Swedish):
There are studies that, although financed by Microsoft, show that Firefox is more often subject so security issues than Internet Explorer because Firefox is released in new versions more often.
First – basic rules of journalism. If a study is paid for by a player in the game then it most likely gives a skewed view of reality. (If Internet Explorer really were safer, Microsoft wouldn’t have to pay someone to come to that conclusion.)
Second – basic rules of software development. That argument is so obviously flawed and backwards I can’t see how anyone could possibly buy it let alone publish it.
… since Google now has a browser of their own they aren’t investing as much in Mozilla when it comes to browsers.
Umm, didn’t Google just renew their deal with Mozilla? This time for three years instead of two.
The biggest advantage for Internet Explorer 8 is its market share, which is at around 75 percent.
Let me say umm again. IE7 and IE6 currently have roughly 35 percent each. If IE8 is going to be deployed or downloaded as slowly as IE7 then it will take many years before it has 75 percent market share.
On a side note: Microsoft really should push their new browsers harder via auto-update systems for the benefit of the web.
Apple’s web browser Safari is usually said to be the third largest, but it isn’t really in the same competition as Internet Explorer, Firefox and Chrome.
That is mainly because Apple isn’t doing as much to create solutions for running applications in the web browser as the competitors.
Wassatagain? Safari 4 will let the user create icons in the operating system as shortcuts for web apps. Are they saying Internet Explorer is doing this too? That would be news to me. (Although I’m not really a big fan of this feature myself, it feels like a step back.)
Another typically journalistic exaggeration. Mozilla may have said Tracemonkey will be faster, but they have never said that it will be that much faster. They will still be in the same league.
All in all, a pretty typical article from IDG.