Archive for September, 2008

Monday, September 29th 2008

Transcend 16 GB Compact Flash Failure

In the spring I bought a 16 GB Transcend Compact Flash card for my camera. I had some problems getting it formatted. But after I did manage to format it, it seemed to be working fine.

David Naylor and Jenny-Lyn Jacobson

Until our wedding day. I had lent my camera to Silvana who was doing most of the photography. Everything was working fine until after the ceremony. Suddenly the camera said Data Corrupted. The camera hung when you tried to view certain photos. She came over to me and we switched to one of my old memory cards.

I thought it was just one or two photos that were lost. As it turned out, I couldn’t get any photos off the card at all.

Viewing the card through Windows Explorer there were loads of files with seemingly random 09f2¤!”%-style filenames. The card size was suddenly claimed to be 248 GB (beat that Pretec). I could see many of the raw image files, but none of them were readable.

After doing a bit of hunting around I found Ahlberg Data in Stockholm. The website claimed that data almost always can be saved from hard drives and flash memory. So, hopeful, I sent them my card.

It turns out there’s a little processor in the card that deals with the communication between the flash memory units and and the camera/computer. This processor had probably been fried to quote the technician I spoke to. Which means that any data you get off the card will be complete gobbledygook.

So they couldn’t either get anything usable off the card.

You would have to open the card and read directly from the memory units. This would involve manual labour (don’t we all hate it!) and would be very expensive. Also, it would have to be done by a company called IBAS in Norway since Ahlberg Data themselves don’t have the right equipment.

But, he claimed, the Russians are building a machine that will be able to read directly from the memory units, bypassing the processor. (With less manual work required, if I got it right.) He said they are planning to buy one of these when they become available — possibly during the autumn.

Anyway, they were very kind and sent the card back without charging anything for the analysis (or postage). So now I have the unreadable card here, hoping that one day I will be able to salvage the photos from our wedding …

Let this be a lesson to anyone thinking of buying a cheap, large memory card. Please leave a comment if you have had similar problems, I’d be very interested to hear about them.

Monday, September 29th 2008

An Oak

18981 - 2008-09-28 kl 17.27

19006 - 2008-09-28 kl 17.40

19016 - 2008-09-28 kl 17.51

19018 - 2008-09-28 kl 17.53

Friday, September 26th 2008

Jettefånig rubrik

På DN.se i dag:

screenshot from dn.se

Tuesday, September 23rd 2008

Tones

XKCD nr 479

More great strips at XKCD.

Monday, September 22nd 2008

Red Currants

Red Currants (röda vinbär)

Red Currants (röda vinbär)

Red Currants (röda vinbär)

Monday, September 22nd 2008

Overexposed

Höstrudbeckia, Rudbeckia laciniata var. hortensia

I don’t normally like the look of overexposed photos but here I think it works really well.

Here’s the technically correct exposere. Much more dull.

Höstrudbeckia, Rudbeckia laciniata var. hortensia

Friday, September 19th 2008

Kissen

På allmän (Hannas) begäran, I give you: Wilma!

18843 - 2008-09-19 kl 15.41

En massa fler bilder finns här.

Wednesday, September 17th 2008

The crazy megapixel race is definitely on

A while back, it seemed as if the megapixel race between camera makers was cooling down and showing some sign of sense. Canon today announced the EOS 5D Mark II, with 21 megapixels.

I’d like to know, do any of the current lenses even come close to providing that kind of detail? I’d much prefer a 12 or 15 MP fullframe camera with super-low noise.

Tuesday, September 16th 2008

Flickr vs Picasa: The best of two worlds, please

I use Flickr for my photos. It’s great in many ways and gives me full control. I can use it both as an online backup and a simple way to show my photos. But it has one drawback:

It sucks for visitors.

What I mean is, it isn’t very easy to use if you’re not a Flickr user yourself. It takes a lot of thinking and guessing.

Screenshot of a photo on flickr

For instance…

  • Sets is not a very intuitive word for albums. Also, the difference between collections and sets is impossible to grasp at a glance.
  • Just something as simple as navigating between photos in a set is unintuitive. Make nice arrows over, or instead of, the navigation thumbnails to the right. Give the user a sense of direction.
  • Why not have the Sets page as the default? Make the photostream an alternative.
  • A set shows tiny, cropped thumbnails by default. There is a Detail page for sets which is much better – make this the default.
  • Commenting on a photo requires that you’re a member. My family shouldn’t have to become Flickr members just to comment on my photos.
  • Flickr is slow! Photos should be preloaded like they are on Picasa. Also, some AJAX wizardry to make better use of the screen would be nice. (The world has moved on from 800×600 screens.)

Picasa, on the other hand, get’s quite a few of these things right.

Screenshot of a Picasa gallery

I guess user interfaces (or the lack of them) are Google’s forte:

  • Clear arrows for navigating between photos.
  • Albums are the first thing a visitor sees.
  • Large, good-looking photos. (Admittedly, Flickr photos look superb, they’re just a bit small.)
  • Thumbnails in albums are not cropped to squares. And the viewer can easily change their size.

At the same time, I don’t want to have to put photos into sets or albums, as one does with Picasa.

So here’s my appeal to Flickr and Picasa: I’d like the Flickr developers to make navigation easier and faster for viewers. And Picasa, get working on the power stuff that Flickr has. I’m thinking of things like the organizer (which is only second to Lightroom when it comes to … organizing).

I’d prefer it if Flickr made the move though, so I don’t have to upload all my photos to Picasa… :)

Tuesday, September 16th 2008

IE8 and max-width

Internet Explorer 8 beta 2 is behaving pretty strange when it comes to max-width. (And min-width?) It seems to cope with it sometimes, and sometimes not.

It passes the Acid2 test (which tests both min/max width/height). It also seems to cope perfectly well with this test page.

So why doesn’t it cope with the max-width rule I have in the CSS of this blog? I haven’t managed to work it out anyway. IE8 b2 doesn’t obey my rule that says paragraphs should be a maximum of 30 em units wide.

I have tried debugging the behaviour by changing various factors in the stylesheets but nothing seems to help. If anyone happens to know about this bug, please leave a comment.

Edit: I finally found the reason for max-width not working. This blog used the XHTML strict doctype which IE8 doesn’t understand. Now I have changed it for the HTML 5 doctype and it works beautifully.