http://davidnaylor.org/blog/2005/02/ogg-vorbis-is-way-better/ Photography, Browsers and Stuff. Sat, 12 May 2012 13:14:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://davidnaylor.org/blog/2005/02/ogg-vorbis-is-way-better/comment-page-1/#comment-4 David Naylor Wed, 03 Aug 2005 23:02:00 +0000 http://naylor83.wordpress.com/2005/02/14/ogg-vorbis-is-way-better#comment-4 If IRC, the WMA was done at fixed 128 kbps. I don't know how to get the VBR WMA into CDEx (or EAC, for that matter). If IRC, the WMA was done at fixed 128 kbps. I don’t know how to get the VBR WMA into CDEx (or EAC, for that matter).

]]> http://davidnaylor.org/blog/2005/02/ogg-vorbis-is-way-better/comment-page-1/#comment-3 David Tenser Mon, 01 Aug 2005 22:50:00 +0000 http://naylor83.wordpress.com/2005/02/14/ogg-vorbis-is-way-better#comment-3 What quality setting do you use then? Using 128 kbps fixed rate is a bad idea, I'm sure you didn't mean that. What quality setting do you use then? Using 128 kbps fixed rate is a bad idea, I’m sure you didn’t mean that.

]]> http://davidnaylor.org/blog/2005/02/ogg-vorbis-is-way-better/comment-page-1/#comment-2 Anonymous Tue, 12 Apr 2005 13:52:00 +0000 http://naylor83.wordpress.com/2005/02/14/ogg-vorbis-is-way-better#comment-2 What kind of WMA were you using? Was it v.9? Also, try using quality-based encoding; set at 75%, it uses between 96 and 128 kbps of bandwidth, but sounds fantastic. What kind of WMA were you using? Was it v.9? Also, try using quality-based encoding; set at 75%, it uses between 96 and 128 kbps of bandwidth, but sounds fantastic.

]]>